➜
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2004-10-18 11:35 by lars.gustaebel, last changed 2022-04-11 14:56 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Files | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| File name | Uploaded | Description | Edit | |
| xdrlib.patch | lars.gustaebel, 2004-10-18 11:35 | bool support for Unpacker | ||
| Messages (5) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg47086 - (view) | Author: Lars Gustäbel (lars.gustaebel) *  |
Date: 2004-10-18 11:35 | |
xdrlib's Unpacker method unpack_bool() is just an alias to the unpack_int() method, therefore it returns an integer. The attached patch adds bool object support to unpack_bool(). |
|||
| msg47087 - (view) | Author: Martin v. Löwis (loewis) * |
Date: 2004-10-19 20:23 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=21627 The patch itself is fine. However, it comes too late for 2.4 - unless Anthony accepts it for 2.4, anyway. |
|||
| msg47088 - (view) | Author: Anthony Baxter (anthonybaxter)  |
Date: 2004-10-20 06:04 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=29957 Nope. This can go in after 2.4 final is out. |
|||
| msg47089 - (view) | Author: Irmen de Jong (irmen) |
Date: 2005-01-16 16:00 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=129426 It would be nice indeed to have unpack_bool return the type that was put into there by pack_bool :) And now that 2.4 is out... |
|||
| msg47090 - (view) | Author: Martin v. Löwis (loewis) * |
Date: 2005-02-24 20:23 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=21627 Thanks for the patch. Applied as xdrlib.py 1.17 test_sundry.py 1.17 test_xdrlib.py 1.1 output/test_xdrlib 1.1 NEWS 1.1245 |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-11 14:56:07 | admin | set | github: 41044 |
| 2004-10-18 11:35:52 | lars.gustaebel | create | |