based on this patch http://mail.python.org/pipermail/patches/2003-
October/013680.html, this extends xmlrpclib further by providing 
automatic batching of xmlrpclib calls that are received within a 
configurable time window. the boxcarring is transparent to the 
caller.

complete source is available here:
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/xmlrpclibmulti/

Logged In: YES 
user_id=21627

There's no uploaded file!  You have to check the
checkbox labeled "Check to Upload & Attach File"
when you upload a file. In addition, even if you
*did* check this checkbox, a bug in SourceForge
prevents attaching a file when *creating* an issue.

Please try again.

(This is a SourceForge annoyance that we can do
nothing about. :-( )

Logged In: YES 
user_id=21627

Also, changing the target version to Python 2.5 - it cannot
get either in 2.3, or 2.4, at this point in time.

Logged In: YES 
user_id=10310

Sorry about the version and lack of file - this is my first time 
submitting a patch. I'll upload the main .py file, but you'll 
probably want to look at the unit tests, etc. too which are all 
available via CVS. Is that OK?

I see these multicall classes (including tests) in python-trunk, except
for the threaded one. So, should this remain open ? If yes, what has to
be done here ?

this issue is about the threaded one.

I think it should be rejected. It does not work:
~/ python2.5 xmlrpclib_multicall.py                         ralf@rat64
failed 1
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "xmlrpclib_multicall.py", line 12, in <module>
    from log.StdLogger import logger
ImportError: No module named log.StdLogger

and the code uses lot's of unused imports.

This code is more than three years old, so the attached version has gone
stale. Still, here at IMVU we have continued to use the xmlrpc
boxcarring, and could probably provide an updated diff if desired. Let
us know if this is a feature of interest.

I personally have no need for it (not even for non-automatic boxcarring).
Note that you would also have to write documentation.

As nobody has asked for this patch to be included, I think its probably
easiest just to reject it. Thanks for offering it in the first place,
though.