➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

classification
Title: why should URL be required for all packages
Type: Stage:
Components: Distutils Versions:
process
Status: closed Resolution: not a bug
Dependencies: Superseder:
Assigned To: Nosy List: jae, loewis, terry.reedy
Priority: normal Keywords:

Created on 2005-03-25 09:58 by jae, last changed 2022-04-11 14:56 by admin. This issue is now closed.

Messages (3)
msg24791 - (view) Author: Jürgen A. Erhard (jae) Date: 2005-03-25 09:58 
Annoying if you just want to roll an in-house package.
msg24792 - (view) Author: Terry J. Reedy (terry.reedy) * (Python committer) Date: 2005-03-30 18:12 
Logged In: YES 
user_id=593130

Bugs are a discrepancy between intended/claimed behavior and 
actual behavior.  Since this does not appear to report such a 
discrepancy, it does not appear to be a bug report.  Please close 
and ask your question and make your comment on the Python 
discussion mailing list or newsgroup (comp.lang.python).
msg24793 - (view) Author: Martin v. Löwis (loewis) * (Python committer) Date: 2005-04-01 21:50 
Logged In: YES 
user_id=21627

In addition, the bug report is under-specified: Who says
that an URL is required for all packages? It certainly is
possible to have packages without URL, so I can't see why
you are annoyed.

Closing the report as "invalid". If you still think there is
a bug in Python, please submit a new report, stating what
you are doing, what happens, and what you expect to happen
instead.
History
Date User Action Args
2022-04-11 14:56:10adminsetgithub: 41759
2005-03-25 09:58:27jaecreate