➜
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2006-03-27 09:05 by nnorwitz, last changed 2022-04-11 14:56 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Messages (5) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg27898 - (view) | Author: Neal Norwitz (nnorwitz) *  |
Date: 2006-03-27 09:05 | |
See my recent checkin on HEAD for fixing def foo((x)): in the AST compiler. I had to modify test_inspect because the above signature should not do tuple unpacking. inspect thinkgs it does though. |
|||
| msg27899 - (view) | Author: Georg Brandl (georg.brandl) * |
Date: 2006-03-27 11:38 | |
Logged In: YES
user_id=849994
That's a bit odd. Following defs:
def bar((x)): pass
def foo(x): pass
In 2.4:
>>> dis.dis(bar)
1 0 LOAD_FAST 0 (.0)
3 STORE_FAST 1 (x)
6 LOAD_CONST 0 (None)
9 RETURN_VALUE
>>> dis.dis(foo)
1 0 LOAD_CONST 0 (None)
3 RETURN_VALUE
In 2.5:
>>> dis.dis(bar)
1 0 LOAD_CONST 0 (None)
3 RETURN_VALUE
>>> dis.dis(foo)
1 0 LOAD_CONST 0 (None)
3 RETURN_VALUE
|
|||
| msg27900 - (view) | Author: Georg Brandl (georg.brandl) * |
Date: 2006-03-27 11:39 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=849994 This at least explains why test_inspect didn't fail for 2.5 after you had fixed the bug and modified the test. |
|||
| msg27901 - (view) | Author: Ziga Seilnacht (zseil) * |
Date: 2006-06-02 02:02 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=1326842 Can this bug be closed? It seems that the only problem was test_inspect relying on the old behavior. |
|||
| msg27902 - (view) | Author: Georg Brandl (georg.brandl) * |
Date: 2006-09-30 11:00 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=849994 Yes, it seems so. |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-11 14:56:16 | admin | set | github: 43096 |
| 2006-03-27 09:05:54 | nnorwitz | create | |