➜
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2006-07-07 09:35 by rhunger, last changed 2022-04-11 14:56 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Files | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| File name | Uploaded | Description | Edit | |
| optparse_dict_2006-07-07.patch | rhunger, 2006-07-07 09:35 | patch to add dict support for class Values | ||
| Messages (4) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg54842 - (view) | Author: rhunger (rhunger) | Date: 2006-07-07 09:35 | |
... from optparse import OptionParser parser = OptionParser() ... (options, args) = parser.parse_args() print options ... options seems to be a dict but isn't. So it's not possible to use e.g. print "Option 1: %(firstOption)s" % options Here it's easy to use "options.firstOption" but with a larger number of program options it would be nice to be able to use "options" as a dict directly. (patch attached) |
|||
| msg54843 - (view) | Author: Neal Norwitz (nnorwitz) *  |
Date: 2006-07-25 04:06 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=33168 Greg, are you using the Python tracker or only optik tracker? |
|||
| msg54844 - (view) | Author: Greg Ward (gward) |
Date: 2006-07-26 02:38 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=14422 Don't believe __str__(): believe the docs. In particular, section 6.21.3.7 of the Python Library Reference is pretty clear that options is not a dict. See http://www.python.org/doc/2.4.3/lib/optparse-parsing-arguments.html If you want a dict, no need to modify optparse: just use vars(options). |
|||
| msg54845 - (view) | Author: Georg Brandl (georg.brandl) * |
Date: 2006-09-30 11:46 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=849994 In any case, this is a feature request. |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-11 14:56:18 | admin | set | github: 43632 |
| 2006-07-07 09:35:21 | rhunger | create | |