This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

classification
Title: compiler package needs better documentation.
Type: enhancement Stage:
Components: Documentation Versions:
process
Status: closed Resolution: fixed
Dependencies: Superseder:
Assigned To: jhylton Nosy List: facundobatista, fdrake, jhylton
Priority: high Keywords:

Created on 2000-11-27 18:33 by fdrake, last changed 2022-04-10 16:03 by admin. This issue is now closed.

Messages (8)
msg2486 - (view) Author: Fred Drake (fdrake) (Python committer) Date: 2000-11-27 18:33
The compiler package is not documented; this needs to be done before tools are likely to be written on top of it.
msg2487 - (view) Author: Fred Drake (fdrake) (Python committer) Date: 2001-01-08 03:48
Jeremy -- is there anything that can be done to make it easier for you to get this done?  I think these should really be documented and moved into the library.
msg2488 - (view) Author: Fred Drake (fdrake) (Python committer) Date: 2001-08-10 21:56
Logged In: YES 
user_id=3066

Jeremy said he'd work on this next week, so I'm bumping the
priority as a reminder.
msg2489 - (view) Author: Fred Drake (fdrake) (Python committer) Date: 2001-12-21 18:19
Logged In: YES 
user_id=3066

I'll note that Jeremy has written basic docs, and they are
in the Library Reference.  But he really needs to polish
them a bit as well, so this stays open but gets a new summary.
msg2490 - (view) Author: Jeremy Hylton (jhylton) (Python triager) Date: 2002-03-01 22:38
Logged In: YES 
user_id=31392

jeremy, get your butt in gear on this!
msg2491 - (view) Author: Facundo Batista (facundobatista) * (Python committer) Date: 2007-03-28 21:00
This is one of the oldest bugs we have...

As the compiler package surely got revised with the inclusion of AST, and the bug was only to remember about polishing... this still needs to be open?
msg2492 - (view) Author: Facundo Batista (facundobatista) * (Python committer) Date: 2007-04-10 13:21
The SVN log reflects that the docs *have* been moved into the Library Reference, and that they have been corrected and polished.

Fred, you said they needed polishing in December 2001. From then, corrections have been made from Georg, Raymond, Brett and edloper.

I'm closing this, but feel free to reopen it if you think that this docs *still* need more polishing.

Regards,
msg2493 - (view) Author: Fred Drake (fdrake) (Python committer) Date: 2007-04-10 14:00
I think this is fine, Facundo.  All docs need polishing, but that's not a bug so long as they're complete, accurate, and readable.

Thanks for checking on this.
History
Date User Action Args
2022-04-10 16:03:31adminsetgithub: 33512
2000-11-27 18:33:59fdrakecreate