➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

classification
Title: datetime docs need review, LaTeX
Type: Stage:
Components: Documentation Versions: Python 2.3
process
Status: closed Resolution: fixed
Dependencies: Superseder:
Assigned To: akuchling Nosy List: akuchling, tim.peters
Priority: normal Keywords:

Created on 2002-12-16 21:07 by tim.peters, last changed 2022-04-10 16:06 by admin. This issue is now closed.

Messages (5)
msg13637 - (view) Author: Tim Peters (tim.peters) * (Python committer) Date: 2002-12-16 21:07 
The datetime sandbox contains a plain text file, 
docs.txt, with about 5,500 words of datetime 
documentation.  This needs review by someone other 
than me, and LaTeXification too.  Kill two birds with one 
tedious stone <wink>.
msg13638 - (view) Author: A.M. Kuchling (akuchling) * (Python committer) Date: 2002-12-17 18:45 
Logged In: YES 
user_id=11375

I'm volunteering for this -- I need to write a whatsnew section on datetime anyway.
msg13639 - (view) Author: Tim Peters (tim.peters) * (Python committer) Date: 2002-12-18 04:18 
Logged In: YES 
user_id=31435

Outstanding -- thanks, Andrew!  I burned too many candles 
at both ends while scrambling to finish the code, and I'm 
sure parts of the docs make no sense.  Feel free to bug me 
in email about the incomprehensible parts.
msg13640 - (view) Author: A.M. Kuchling (akuchling) * (Python committer) Date: 2003-03-03 20:21 
Logged In: YES 
user_id=11375

The datetime docs now seem to be reasonably complete and 
correctly marked up, so I'm closing this bug.
msg13641 - (view) Author: Tim Peters (tim.peters) * (Python committer) Date: 2003-03-04 04:19 
Logged In: YES 
user_id=31435

Yup -- thanks, Andrew!
History
Date User Action Args
2022-04-10 16:06:02adminsetgithub: 37619
2002-12-16 21:07:00tim.peterscreate