➜
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2003-05-02 12:56 by niederberger, last changed 2022-04-10 16:08 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Files | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| File name | Uploaded | Description | Edit | |
| bdistrpmrh9.diff | niederberger, 2003-05-02 12:56 | bdist_rpm patch | ||
| Messages (6) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg43575 - (view) | Author: Ricardo Niederberger Cabral (niederberger) | Date: 2003-05-02 12:56 | |
When trying to build an rpm on RH 9:
From distutils __version__ = "1.0.3":
File "distutils/command/bdist_rpm.py", line 316, in run
assert len(rpms) == 1, \
AssertionError: unexpected number of RPM files found: ['build/bdist.
linux-i686/rpm/RPMS/i386/imgSeek-0.7-1.i386.rpm', 'build/bdist.
linux-i686/rpm/RPMS/i386/imgSeek-debuginfo-0.7-1.i386.rpm']
I had to remove the assert statement on bdist_rpm.py:316 in order to
build my rpm since rpmbuild from RH always seems to generate this
extra -debuginfo rpm.
So attached is a patch (cvs rev 1.37) to simply copy all generated
RPM's to the dist/ directory.
|
|||
| msg43576 - (view) | Author: Martin v. Löwis (loewis) *  |
Date: 2003-05-03 11:01 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=21627 Can you provide more information? What rpm gets generated, and what files does it contain? |
|||
| msg43577 - (view) | Author: Ricardo Niederberger Cabral (niederberger) | Date: 2003-05-28 01:59 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=354686 Sorry for not replying faster and providing more info. SF tracker didn't email me about your comment, and I don't have the RH system at hand right now. Anyway, it generates: foo-version.i386.rpm foo-version.src.rpm foo-debuginfo-version.i386.rpm instead of only the binary and src rpm's I would get on Mandrake 9 for example, which is what bdist_rpm.py currently expects. I don't know exactly what goes inside this debug-info rpm, but i guess it's probably the binary one compiled with debug symbols on. I can provide more info if necessary in a few days. |
|||
| msg43578 - (view) | Author: Georg Brandl (georg.brandl) * |
Date: 2005-03-03 14:36 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=1188172 Does anyone still care about this issue? Or, other way round, does anything speak against applying and so copying all RPMs? |
|||
| msg43579 - (view) | Author: Sean Reifschneider (jafo) * |
Date: 2006-05-22 08:52 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=81797 Is 1.0.3 from the Red Hat RPMs, the python.org RPMs (which version), or directly downloaded from the distutils? If this is an issue in Distutils, I'd be interested in still fixing it. However, there hasn't been any activity on this in 3 years, so I'm planning on closing this unless I hear something further over, say, the next few weeks. Red Hat 9.1 is extremely legacy now, of course. Not at all supported for errata by either Red Hat or the other Legacy sites, so I'm inclined to feel the same. |
|||
| msg43580 - (view) | Author: Sean Reifschneider (jafo) * |
Date: 2006-06-13 12:09 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=81797 No activity on this in the last several weeks. This is fixed in newer Fedora releases, and Red Hat 9.1 is no longer supported by Legacy projects. |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-10 16:08:31 | admin | set | github: 38424 |
| 2003-05-02 12:56:45 | niederberger | create | |