➜
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2003-05-21 00:43 by mboedick, last changed 2022-04-10 16:08 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Files | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| File name | Uploaded | Description | Edit | |
| urldecode.patch | mboedick, 2003-05-21 00:43 | path to add urldecode() method to urllib | ||
| Messages (6) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg43816 - (view) | Author: Matthew Boedicker (mboedick) | Date: 2003-05-21 00:43 | |
Adds a urldecode() method to urllib. The method does the opposite of urlencode, turns a url-encoded string into a list of two-tuples of name/value pairs. |
|||
| msg43817 - (view) | Author: Brett Cannon (brett.cannon) *  |
Date: 2003-05-21 03:21 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=357491 How is this different from cgi.parse_sql ? If it is not different, consider just having a wrapper for urldecode that calls cgi.parse_sql . Do you think urllib is the best place for this? What about urlparse? |
|||
| msg43818 - (view) | Author: Matthew Boedicker (mboedick) | Date: 2003-05-21 14:25 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=119895 It is not different than cgi.parse_qsl. Must have missed that module when I was looking for this functionality. To me it seems like urlencode and urldecode (as well as quote, quote_plus, unquote, etc.) belong in urlparse. Do you think it would be valuable to include a pointer to cgi.parse_qsl in urllib or urllparse? |
|||
| msg43819 - (view) | Author: Brett Cannon (brett.cannon) * |
Date: 2003-05-21 16:00 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=357491 I think so, but I don't know which one. I only use urllib.urlopen ever so if you have a specific suggestion from experience please make it and submit a patch. Since I don't use either modules extensively someone else is going to need to step in and help make any final decisions. |
|||
| msg43820 - (view) | Author: Irmen de Jong (irmen)  |
Date: 2005-01-16 15:41 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=129426 I've always found it strange that url-manipulating methods were present in the cgi module. I agree that it would be nicer to have them grouped together in a single module such as urlparse. So I wouldn't add urldecode to urllib. |
|||
| msg43821 - (view) | Author: Martin v. Löwis (loewis) * |
Date: 2005-02-24 20:02 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=21627 It appears that all reviewers agree that the patch should not be applied. Rejecting it. |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-10 16:08:50 | admin | set | github: 38532 |
| 2003-05-21 00:43:29 | mboedick | create | |