➜
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2003-10-28 06:53 by anthonybaxter, last changed 2022-04-11 14:56 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Files | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| File name | Uploaded | Description | Edit | |
| configure-solaris-term.h | anthonybaxter, 2003-10-28 06:53 | configure.in and configure patch | ||
| Messages (7) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg18778 - (view) | Author: Anthony Baxter (anthonybaxter)  |
Date: 2003-10-28 06:53 | |
Solaris' term.h requires curses.h to be included first. This causes the configure script to emit lines about a bug in autoconf. From the autoconf mailing lists, their standard response is to fix the configure script, see e.g. http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-autoconf/2003-05/msg00118.html The following patch against 2.3 branch for configure and configure.in makes things a bit happier. Note that Include/py_curses.h already includes curses.h before term.h, this just fixes the breakage of configure. |
|||
| msg18779 - (view) | Author: Neal Norwitz (nnorwitz) *  |
Date: 2003-10-28 13:08 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=33168 Should the #if be an #ifdef ? Looks fine to me, but I don't know much about autoconf. :-) I think Martin is the expert. Martin do you have an opinion? |
|||
| msg18780 - (view) | Author: Anthony Baxter (anthonybaxter) |
Date: 2003-10-29 01:38 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=29957 Dunno if #ifdef is better or not - I just worked from the example in the attached autoconf mailing list message. |
|||
| msg18781 - (view) | Author: Martin v. Löwis (loewis) * |
Date: 2003-10-31 15:22 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=21627 I find it confusing that the test for curses.h already refers to HAVE_CURSES_H; I think you should first check for curses.h, and then use HAVE_CURSES_H in the test for term.h I also agree that #ifdef is better than #if, even though it should not matter in an ISO C compiler (which replaces undefined symbols by 0 in an #if). |
|||
| msg18782 - (view) | Author: A.M. Kuchling (akuchling) * |
Date: 2007-01-05 14:33 | |
Is this bug still relevant to Python 2.5? |
|||
| msg82017 - (view) | Author: Daniel Diniz (ajaksu2) * |
Date: 2009-02-14 11:36 | |
Is the configure script still emitting lines about a bug in autoconf on Solaris? |
|||
| msg87641 - (view) | Author: Daniel Diniz (ajaksu2) * |
Date: 2009-05-12 17:08 | |
Closing on lack of feedback. |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-11 14:56:00 | admin | set | github: 39465 |
| 2009-05-12 17:08:40 | ajaksu2 | set | status: pending -> closed resolution: rejected messages: + msg87641 stage: resolved |
| 2009-04-05 18:25:41 | georg.brandl | set | status: open -> pending |
| 2009-02-14 11:36:06 | ajaksu2 | set | nosy:
+ ajaksu2 type: behavior messages: + msg82017 |
| 2003-10-28 06:53:44 | anthonybaxter | create | |