➜
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2004-05-24 16:13 by jfclere, last changed 2022-04-11 14:56 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Files | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| File name | Uploaded | Description | Edit | |
| configure.in.patch | jfclere, 2004-05-25 13:10 | better patch for configure.in | ||
| Messages (7) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg46043 - (view) | Author: Jean-frederic Clere (jfclere) | Date: 2004-05-24 16:13 | |
When compiling python on ReliantUnix (5.43) the compilation fails with unresolved externals like fstatvfs64, lseek64 etc Those routines belong to 5.45. The patch detects the missing lseek64() and suppress lfs support (use_lfs=no). |
|||
| msg46044 - (view) | Author: Martin v. Löwis (loewis) *  |
Date: 2004-05-31 18:27 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=21627 Why do you check for SINIX after the link test fails? |
|||
| msg46045 - (view) | Author: Jean-frederic Clere (jfclere) | Date: 2004-06-01 16:56 | |
Logged In: YES
user_id=92497
Oops... That is better to check for SINIX-* before trying
the link.
I have more to submit because the dynamic linking needs
additional libc. For example in setup.py
+++
exts.append( Extension('_hotshot', ['_hotshot.c'],
libraries=['c']) )
+++
|
|||
| msg46046 - (view) | Author: Martin v. Löwis (loewis) * |
Date: 2004-06-01 22:17 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=21627 Hmm. Why are you checking for Sinix at all? If the test fails, isn't it likely that LFS doesn't work on the platform? |
|||
| msg46047 - (view) | Author: Jean-frederic Clere (jfclere) | Date: 2004-06-03 07:07 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=92497 Checking for Sinix is need because the SINIX unistd.h redefines lseek() into lseek64() when LFS is required (via _FILE_OFFSET_BITS and/or _LFS64_LARGEFILE). Checking for LFS via AC_TRY_LINK for most platforms means more tests. |
|||
| msg46048 - (view) | Author: Martin v. Löwis (loewis) * |
Date: 2004-06-03 18:13 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=21627 Performing checks on all platforms is not a problem; the time that configure needs is not critical. If the test were run on all systems, would there be any negative functional effects? |
|||
| msg46049 - (view) | Author: Martin v. Löwis (loewis) * |
Date: 2005-03-03 23:55 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=21627 Rejecting the patch due to lack of response. |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-11 14:56:04 | admin | set | github: 40284 |
| 2004-05-24 16:13:46 | jfclere | create | |